Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) recently published a game test article on the official blog of RX 7000 and RX 6000 series graphics cards. According to the official comparison data, the RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT are ahead of the RX 6000 series in terms of frame rate at 2160p, but the price has also increased overall.
Cost-effectiveness comparison
AMD officials have also honestly marked the cost-effective data of frame number/dollar. It can be seen that the cost-effectiveness of RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT is at the bottom. It seems that in terms of AMD's high-end graphics cards, buying RX 6950 XT is a more good choice.
In addition, the AMD RX 6000 series is also the most cost-effective according to the cost-effective ranking of graphics cards by TechPowerUP. In terms of NVIDIA, except for RTX 4070 Ti, the rest of the graphics cards are ranked low.
This comparison data shows that the older models of graphics cards are still more cost-effective in terms of performance and price. It is important to consider the cost-effectiveness of a graphics card before making a purchase, especially for those who are on a budget.
New models vs. old models
The RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT are the newest models of AMD's high-end graphics cards and they have higher frame rates at 2160p than the RX 6000 series. However, their prices have also increased, making them less cost-effective than the older models.
The RX 6950 XT, on the other hand, is an older model but it still offers good performance at a more affordable price. This makes it a better choice for those who are looking for a high-end graphics card that is cost-effective.
AMD's game test for the RX 7000 and RX 6000 series graphics cards shows that the older models are still more cost-effective in terms of performance and price. It is important to consider the cost-effectiveness of a graphics card before making a purchase, especially for those who are on a budget. The RX 6950 XT is a good choice for those who are looking for a high-end graphics card that is cost-effective.
0 Comments